Matt Hayden
I recently read an article espousing
the joys of celibacy. My first thought: What bloody joys?
I read on, and learned that now there are more people than ever
who claim to be "happily" single.
This description annoyed me. It
seemed oxymoronic.
Being single certainly has
advantages. And yes, you can get used to it. But it's not an
ideal state of affairs. I would say that
"reluctantly single" is a more accurate description.
And I do think that there is a
common thread running through the lives of the reluctantly
single:
They are used to their freedom. They
don't want to get caught up in a relationship. But
then they do crave sex - and a little tenderness. But
just a little. Only on the weekends. And only on
THEIR TERMS!
Unfortunately their terms don't suit
anyone else's terms. Not for long, anyway. So they
part as quickly as they find each other and return
to being...reluctantly single.
So the cycle continues. They become
serial monogamists. (And some find it so
frustrating they become serial killers!)
Occasionally they are interviewed
for articles on single-hood. And they all claim to
be fantastically "happy" of course! (I know, I'm
being cynical. The situation today is probably no worse
than in an earlier, more conservative time.
Then, there were as many people falsely claiming to be
"happily" married.)
So, people are in a quandary
nowadays. But there are some who find a kind of solution:
They separate sex and love.
I went out with a woman like this.
She was a phone sex performer.
I adored her. Yet our love-making
always seemed so mechanical. See, she insisted on
narrating everything:
"I'm sitting on my bed. I'm not
wearing any clothes.
Now, I'm spreading my legs..."
"I know," I'd say. "I'm right here
next to you!"
God, that pissed me off. Almost as
much as the fact that she'd flick through magazines
while we were doing it. Then there was the four bucks
ninety per minute I had to pay for the privilege!
She had completely mastered the art
of emotional detachment. So she wasn't unhappy.
But she wasn't happy, either.
Clearly, it's difficult to find
happiness in love, or in sex, or in separating the two.
So, where do you look?
They say that the happiest people
are those who have renounced sex completely. Buddhist
monks, for instance. I used to think these guys were
faking it, and were utterly miserable. But I spoke to a
Buddhist a while ago, and he seemed truly happy with
his lot. (In fact, he seemed ecstatic. All through our
meeting he kept cracking up. Then I discovered I had
my fly undone. I hastily did it up. He stopped
giggling then and went from ecstatic to merely elated.)
He explained that the Buddhist
attitude was not to pursue satisfaction; simply to find
it.
"So, I sate my appetites by not
sating them?" I asked.
"You could say that," he said,
beaming.
"Can this work with anything?"
"Yes, anything!"
I decided to try this with sex. But
then I realized I wasn't getting any anyway. So I
tried it with food instead.
Nearly died from malnutrition.
I tried to sue him. But those bloody
Buddhists - they've got no assets!
Oh well, that's life - and love:
Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. And damned if
you can't make up your mind!
Still, it's pretty funny, don't you
think?
END.
Copyright Matt Hayden, Nov 2004.
www.geocities.com/matthaydenwriter